I allege that this page contains actual physical evidence of 2 criminal cases where each time the charge was Unlawful Stalking and that each crime was actually fabricated by Police, and for all of the total of 3 Witness Statements ( the 2nd case included an Addendum Statement also ) which were claimed by Police to be those of the young women who Police claimed to be the complainant in each case were actually fabricated by Queensland Police, including the signatures on them which I allege this page provides actual physical evidence were actually forged by another person. I allege there was also one Witness in each case who was impersonated by another person, and that the audio files on this page provide proof of that. I allege there is evidence that the main motives for the 2nd crime to be, I allege, fabricated, were to attempt to reduce my credibilty in relation to exposing the truth in the first, I allege, fabricated crime, that is, exposing successfully what could possibly be judged as serious crimes of Forgery and Perjury by Police, and I allege, Unlawful Stalking of a large number of women by a man named Senior Sergeant Drew Ferguson since at least 2008, who all suffered serious detriment to their employment by being transferred from their usual place of work. For her privacy I will refer to the woman claimed by Police to have been the complainant in the 1st. case as Janelle ( not her real name ). For her privacy I will refer to the woman claimed by Police to have been the complainant in the 2nd. case as Beth ( not her real name ). Links audio file Court Transcript 26.5.11, Size 35.7MB which shows the voice of the man who appears in the first 2 photos on the left of this page below who I allege appeared in the Magistrates Court, Beenleigh on the 26th. May 2011, and impersonated the man who appears in the 3rd photo in the first row of photos shown below. He was sworn in as Michael Shippley in the 1st. case. audio file of the Police Interview that had been claimed to be with Beth on 6.9.13, Size 5.4MB which I allege shows the voice of a different woman impersonating Beth. audio file Beth on 17.9.13, Size 1.8MB. I allege that just after this audio file had been played in Court for the 1st. time, that I heard the Prosecution's Barrister's assistant say ( I was at the bar table which meant I was the closest person in the Courtroom to the Barrister Michael Gawrych and his assistant ) to Michael Gawrych "Thats not good for our case" and that Michael Gawrych replied "Yeah, we should do something about that!". The 2nd. time the audio file was played in Court I noticed that the 2 words "Yeah, I" that Beth had spoken had been deleted. This was after the audio file on a 4GB USB Flash Drive had been taken by the Judge's Associate immediately after being played the 1st. time, and was then under the Court's official custody. A copy of the Supreme Court Appeal Hearing related to the 2nd case. I have edited this copy to show a fictional name of Beth. The file is in Open Document Text format which can be read using the free program Libre Office. A copy of the Unlawful Stalking Amendment Act 1999 Senior Sergeant Drew Ferguson, also had himself appointed, or was appointed, to be the Police Prosecutor in the 1st. case initially. I allege there is evidence that after the 1st. time he and I were in the Beenleigh Court which was on 17.1.11 he decided it was wiser for him not to continue as the Police Prosecutor. It was already too late though as I allege that I had already recognised his voice on the 17.1.11 as being that of the man who I allege had been misusing his position as a Police Officer to Unlawfully Stalk myself and a large number of women over a long period of time especially women who worked at Woolworths Beenleigh. I allege that from August 2009 to the present time there have been 3 separate times that I have heard Senior Sergeant Drew Ferguson refer to women as "bitches". One of those times was in late 2015, and I heard him say the words "those bitches at Suncorp". I had never even been accused of any crime in my whole life before and as Senior Constable Craig Bowman did not know me at all previously I believe there are reasons to suspect that it was Senior Sergeant Drew Ferguson who gave the order to Craig Bowman to, I allege, fabricate the 1st. case, and I allege that there are reasons to suspect that it was Senior Sergeant Drew Ferguson and also Senior Constable Craig Bowman who were behind the decision for a 2nd case to be, I allege, fabricated. I allege that it was very obvious that the 2 Police Officers who arrived at my home early in the morning on 20.9.13 did not know me at all or even know that I owned and managed https://australianwebsites.com I allege that one of the most striking examples of Unlawful Stalking, by I allege, Drew Ferguson, and from 2012, I allege there is evidence that Senior Constable Craig Bowman was also participating in the Unlawful Stalking of women who worked at Woolworths Beenleigh, was against a very intelligent young woman named Ashley Wegman who I have witnessed evidence was discriminated against by Management in Woolworths Beenleigh and transferred a total of 6 times from July 2013 to March 2016. I allege that on the Sunday 16th November 2014, I saw 2 men in Woolworths Beenleigh as I was waiting in line at the checkout. They appeared to be Police in plain clothes from their appearance, the way they were talking and the fact they had no shopping items. The one who looked and sounded to be the most senior of the 2 men was wearing a brown jacket and brown tie, that is, not a typical type of attire for shopping on a Sunday. I allege I heard the other man say to him "He does'nt seem like a bad guy" and that he replied "Yeah, but he's got something on one of us" Then I allege the other man looked at a woman named Casey who worked in Woolworths Beenleigh who was some distance away and said to the man who appeared to be more senior "Maybe we should get rid of her too" It seemed they believed that she was a friend of Ashley's and may help Ashley to communicate with me. At that time Ashley had been transferred for the 4th. time. About 2 weeks after the 16th November 2014, the date that I allege that I had heard the comment "Maybe we should get rid of her too" Casey ( who I can recall being there for at least 4 years previously ) had ceased being employed at Woolworths Beenleigh and I have never noticed her there since then. About one week after the 16th November 2014 I asked at the Service Desk to talk to the Manager or Assistant Manager. I then had a brief discussion with the Assistant Manager, a man named Kerry, and I pointed out to him that I had already witnessed a woman who was part of management at the time say to one of the female staff named Roxy one evening in September 2013 after referring to Ashley "We're going to get rid of that bitch". This was shortly before Ashley was transferred for the 2nd time. I allege that just after my brief discussion that day with the Assistant Manager named Kerry where I had pointed out it was very unethical for Ashley to be discriminated against, that as I was walking away I heard Kerry say to one of the male staff who appeared to be around 22 years old, "Fuck! Thats the 4th. time we've tried to get rid of that bitch and failed!" I had also had a discussion with either the Store Manager or Assistant Manager after the first 3 times that Ashley had been transferred and each time I had also been successful in ending the discrimination that Ashley had been subjected to and she was returned to working at Woolworths Beenleigh. I allege that from June 2013 to September 2013 there was a male Police Officer in plain clothes who it seemed by his clothing and general appearance was pretending to be a homeless man who was usually standing outside within 15 metres of the main entrance to the Market Place Shopping Centre in Beenleigh nearly every time I went shopping during those 4 months. One evening while shopping in Woolworths Beenleigh I allege that I witnessed Ashley say to this man "Don't you think that what your doing is Unlawful Stalking?" and that he replied in a boasting kind of way "I get paid for stalking people" and that this man went on to make a number of threats to Ashley - That if she called me that the Management would find out and he implied to her that her employment in Woolworths Beenleigh would be adversely effected. Also that if she tried to call me he said that "We could block your calls". In reply Ashley said that if they did that she could drive to my place to see me in person. I allege he then replied "If you did that we could charge you with Unlawful Stalking" then Ashley replied that for her to be charged with Unlawful Stalking that the only possible way that could happen would be if I were to cooperate with Police to do that and that she did not think there would be any chance of that happening. Which is 100% correct. If Ashley were to call me or drive to my place to talk to me in person there is not the slightest chance I would ever cooperate with Police to fabricate a false charge against Ashley, and with the pattern of discrimination that I have witnessed against her over a long period of time which has also included serious discrimination against at least 3 of her friends who used to be employed in Woolworths Beenleigh, with I allege evidence that 3 of her friends were transferred against their will, with Melissa being transferred in January 2012, with Karena being transferred in December 2012, and with Casey being transferred in early December 2014, I would have no doubt that Ashley could seek a very substantial amount of compensation for the way she has been treated at Woolworths Beenleigh over a very long period of time. I allege that in December 2014 Ashley said that she had been told by Management that she was not allowed to smile at me and that it had been inferred that if she did smile that her employment would be negatively effected. Since the new Store Manager, a man named Lee Snell started at Woolworths Beenleigh Ashley appears to have been discriminated against for a 6th time and also I allege there is evidence that a girl with blond hair whose name I do not know was unlawfully stalked by Senior Constable Craig Bowman earlier this year and was fired after her first day at work for smiling and being friendly towards myself. I allege it was the next day after she was there that I heard Senior Constable Craig Bowman on the property next door to mine ( I live on 3 Hectares of land in Bahrs Scrub which has been rezoned to being part of a "Major Urban Development area" with a zoning of being divided into 15 to 20 dwellings per Hectare ) talk about her and say that they could get rid of her as I would not really be able to say anything about her to the media as I would not even know her name. A few weeks after she was no longer there I heard one of the female staff in the Service Desk area make a comment about her to other female staff in the Service Desk area that she had never seen anyone fired like that before after just one day. I felt quite shocked at how ruthless the treatment of her had been and that it was consistent with the treatment I had witnessed earlier of many women who had worked at Woolworths Beenleigh, that they appear to have been treated as if their lives had no value. I allege that there is evidence that it seemed that the main reason that some people in management in Woolworths Beenleigh thought that Ashley was a problem ( from their point of view ) was that they thought she had a very strong personality and would help me to expose the truth relating to how so many women at Woolworths Beenleigh had been discriminated against and transferred, and what could be judged as criminal activity by people misusing their positions as Police to unlawfully stalk women. I allege there is also evidence that some people in management at Woolworths Beenleigh started thinking that many women who had worked there including Ashley, could sue Woolworths for a very substantial amount of money and that transferring and keeping them separate from each other was the best solution to keep that from happening, as some people in management appeared to have the opinion that if they were separate there would be much less chance of any woman having the strength of will on her own to start talking to a lawyer. I allege that in 2015 I heard the previous Store Manager at Woolworths Beenleigh, a woman named Kiley say the word" strategy" and referring to singling out women to be transferred and said it was a "strategy that had worked". I allege there is evidence that Drew Ferguson and Craig Bowman felt that it would be inconvenient for them if an attractive younger woman started going out with myself ( and so have been unlawfully stalking a large number of young women, particularly at Woolworths Beenleigh ) as that would tend to disprove a theory that the Prosecution tried to put forward in each case that a younger woman could not possibly be interested in a man who was older, even one who is a multi millionaire such as myself. I estimate the total cost of these 2 cases to Queensland Taxpayers, ( which for the 2nd. case included a Trial process of 14 days from 2.2.15, including 2 separate Jury selections, one on 2.2.15 and a 2nd. Jury selection on 3.2.15, involving a total of around 70 people being called to the District Court for the Jury selections ) would have been well over $250,000 ( or to put it another way enough money for the QLD Government to have provided a job for the 1st year to around 5 additional first year Nurses in our Public Hospitals ) where I allege Taxpayer funded resources were not just wasted but knowingly and deliberately misused to harass myself and the 2 intelligent young women in particular who had been, I allege falsely, claimed by Police to have been complainants in these 2 cases, each of which also included an Appeal Hearing in the Brisbane Supreme Court. I would also add that the alleged behaviour of Police would have caused very serious disruption and distraction and therefore very significant detriment to the lives of each of these 2 intelligent young women at a time which was very important in each of their lives when they were each part way through studying at University. I would therefore allege that it would be appropriate that a number of Police, particularly Senior Sergeant Drew Ferguson and Senior Constable Craig Bowman should be charged with the crime of Unlawful Stalking, and I also allege that it would be appropriate for a number of Police, particularly Senior Sergeant Drew Ferguson and Senior Constable Craig Bowman to be charged with the crime of Unlawful Stalking of myself also. I allege that near the beginning of October 2014 I heard the voice of Senior Sergeant Drew Ferguson coming from the property ( corner block ) next door to my property refer to Beth and say in a very threatening way "We've never not been able to get someone to go along with what we wanted them to say before. We'll tell her that she has to live in Queensland for the rest of her life and if she does'nt go along with what we want her to say, that we'll make her life hell for the rest of her life." I allege he also said in a very threatening way "We'll have him killed once we get him into prison", and that over a period of many years now he has made numerous threats to myself, which have included many threats to kill me, which have been made by the method of making statements out loud, and also very threatening comments while in conversation with other men. These have all occurred while he was on the property ( corner block ) next door to my property. While these threats have usually been made from a distance of around 25 to 60 metres they appear to have been very deliberate in nature, with an apparent intention to try to intimidate myself, and to attempt to instill fear, with some conversations, I have felt, being indistinguishable from conversations with a genuine intent to attempt to make plans to kill me, with the most common threat having been to kill me during a time when I would be asleep. I allege that in late 2017 I heard this part of a conversation between Senior Sergeant Les Richards and Senior Constable Christopher MacDonald ( who had been the main 2 Police Officers involved in, I allege, fabricating the 2nd. case. ) while they were standing in the top area of the driveway on the corner block next door to my property. Senior Constable Christopher MacDonald made a comment about killing me to make sure that I could not be a witness "against us". Senior Sergeant Les Richards replied: "You know, its not easy to just kill someone." Then Senior Constable Christopher MacDonald replied: "I can. I can carry out the killing." In the 2nd case there were 2 main allegations by Police - That there was one day that I had followed Beth ( This was refuted by Beth herself in the first day of the trial. She said that she had walked beside me for a distance of "a few hundred metres" and it was discussed in Court that we had had a conversation along the way ) inside the Logan Hyperdome Shopping Centre, and that I had invited Beth out to dinner to a French Restaurant. I pointed out during the trial that eventhough there were numerous cameras that would cover virtually every square metre inside the main hall of the Logan Hyperdome Shopping Centre that Police had not been able to provide any video of that day where Beth and I happened to see each other just after I had been doing my banking in Suncorp Bank which is inside the Logan Hyperdome. I had requested in writing to Police ( and I had a photocopy of my written request which had been stamped and signed by the person who had received my written request in the Beenleigh Police Station, as a receipt and I was able to submit this in the trial ) to provide videos of that day and also of the claimed event of Beth walking into the Logan Police Beat ( Which is inside the Logan Hyperdome Shopping Centre with a camera in the ceiling just outside the entrance) on a separate day. Even after Magistrate Morgan gave an order to Police that they should cooperate in providing any videos that I requested, Police failed or claimed they were unable or to provide any videos of either of those claimed events. FURTHER DETAILS - I allege this page contains: 1. Links to 3 audio files - The 1st. is the Court recording provided by Auscript of a man who was sworn in as a Crown Witness named Michael Shippley on 26.5.11, and I allege the audio provides evidence that the voice in the audio Transcript belongs to that of the man shown in the first 2 photos on the left of this page below and that he was impersonating in Court Janelle's other boyfriend shown in the 3rd. photo on the left of this page below, and I allege there is evidence that the alleged impersonation was organised by Senior Sergeant Drew Ferguson and Senior Constable Craig Bowman. When I put to the man who had been sworn in as a Witness named Michael Shippley in cross examination that the man who had been at Coles on 14.1.10 ( that is, the man he was supposed to be ) had been no taller than 173cm tall at that time ( he stated in Court on 26.5.11 that he was 186cm tall ) part of his reply was "people grow". The time interval between the 14.1.10 and the day this man appeared in Court on 26.5.11 to give Testimony under Oath during a Committal Hearing was 16 months and 12 days. Janelle had published a photo shown below of herself standing next to the same man who appeared In Court which showed a Posting Date of 28 June 2009. I would estimate Janelle's height in June 2009 to be around 172cm tall. 2. I allege actual physical evidence of a fabricated signature on the Witness Statements of each claimed complainant. in each case. Documents are shown below so that a comparison can be made of handwriting and signatures. I alleged that the signature which appeared on 2 separate Witness Statements which showed Beth's name as the Witness seemed to spell a different person's name, that the signature appeared to spell a surname of Bell followed by the initial "W" which is completely different to Beth's last name and her real first name does not start with the the initial "W". I note that each of the letters in the signature on the Witness Statements slopes to the left while each letter in Beth's signature shown on 2 Rain Check Documents below slopes to the right. My 1st. career after leaving High School was working in a Bank for 7.5 years, most of the time as the most senior Teller in a Bank Branch and also as a Bank Examiner during which time I checked signatures an average of around 100 times per day, which equals around 180,000 times in 7.5 years, during which time I never saw a single example of any person changing the slope of each letter in their signature from right to left. I had also completed a Formal Course in my 1st year, run by the Bank, which included significant training in signature comparison. I also allege that the signature on the Witness Statement showing Janelle's name appears to be a very stylish and well developed signature typical of a much older person, that is, most likely at least 25 years older than Janelle, and typical of a person who had signed their signature a very large number of times during their lifetime, and that the signature was very very different to Janelle's handwriting. I also allege that its possible to tell that the signature on the A4 size page shown below was signed with a different pen as the signature shows a darker ink by comparison with the 3 lines showing Janelle's handwriting and that its possible to tell that when the signature was put on the same A4 sheet of paper that the person put much more pressure of the pen on the paper compared to the pressure put on the paper for Janelle's 3 lines of handwriting, that the faint dots above the words "input" and "in" and "making" in particular show that Janelle only put very light pressure of pen on paper. The main allegation in the 1st case was that I had offered Janelle a part time office job and the Prosecution seemed to try to imply that I had only offered her a job because I thought that she was attractive. ( My very attractive ex-girlfriend of 10 years from 2001 to 2011 who is a Doctor with a PHD and a Post Doctorate in Neurology was living with me 24 hours a day during 2009 ). I allege that when I was in a room on the other side of the hall from the Beenleigh District Court, Courtroom 1 on 17.5.12 there was a Lawyer named Samit Seth and a Barrister ( who had been referred to as a Mr. Bagley from the Gold Coast ) in the room ( who had been paid for by Queensland Taxpayers ) and that they were both strongly trying to push me to plead guilty, with the Barrister saying things such as anything could happen in a trial and that if I accepted the deal that had been offered by the Prosecution there would only be a probation period with no conviction recorded, and that it would just mean that I would need to visit a Probation Office occasionally and that after a while it would only be once every 6 months. I consistently refused to plead guilty for over 30 minutes and I allege that I said to the Lawyer that I did not believe it had been Janelle's signature on the Witness Statement. I allege that after some time the Lawyer seemed a bit impatient and said to me if he went out and obtained her signature would I be prepared to plead guilty. I gave him 6 A4 sheets of paper and I put my initials on the back of each sheet of paper before giving them to him. He went out and returned about 10 minutes later with a signature at the bottom of each sheet of A4 paper including one which had 3 lines of Janelle's handwriting on it. I also allege that just after walking out of the Courtroom later that day and while still in the hall outside, that the Lawyer and the Barrister were walking together about 10 metres in front of me, and that I heard the Barrister say to the Lawyer "Well, you did the Police a big favour covering that up for them". It was only due to a short time later that I had lodged an appeal to the Brisbane Supreme Court that I received a typed Transcript of the District Court Hearing that took place on the 17.5.12. I felt surprised to discover when reading it that the Barrister who I knew as a Mr Bagley had claimed in Court that day, ( at a time while I was in the room across the hall ) while talking to Judge Dearden in Court, that he had had a 1 hour meeting scheduled with myself inside the Beenleigh Court House the day before on the 16.5.12 and that the meeting had taken place and had actually then been extended to last for 3 hours. The reason I felt surprised to read this in the Transcript was that there had never been any meeting scheduled between myself and Mr. Bagley for the 16.5.12 and I definitely never even entered the Beenleigh Court House building on the 16.5.12. The only discussion there had been from the Lawyer Samit Seth about meeting the Barrister was that he would be there on the 1st. Floor at, I think it was 10am on the 17.5.12 so that I would have some time to talk with him then. I still remember clearly that on the morning of the 17.5.12 I saw a man sitting in a room opposite the District Court and that the first thing I said to him was "Hi, my name is Barry. Are you waiting for me?" as I had never met him before ( or talked with him on the phone ) and had not been given any clue as to what he looked like. 3. I allege that one of the audio files provides actual physical evidence of a Police interview with a woman who is impersonating Beth in the interview and that this was played in the District Court Beenleigh as being claimed to be Beth's voice. I allege also there is evidence that a number of Police were aware that the audio interview was fabricated with another woman impersonating Beth. Please also note that apart from, I allege, a different voice and a different style of talking and personality, the woman's voice uses the word "plaid" and it was stated by a Crown Witness in the trial, Beth's supervisor, that Beth had only ever said to her that I always wore "business" shirts. 4. I allege that the audio file showing Beth's voice in conversation with myself on the 17.9.13 ( which was the last day that Beth and I were talking to each other in Woolworths. ) provides evidence that at the point which is 1 minute and 28 seconds into the audio file that it is possible to tell that 4 words "it has to be" said by myself are quickly repeated in the audio file, and repeated precisely in sound and tone, and rather than indicating that I was repeating those words as part of the conversation, that section of conversation from the 1 minute and 28 seconds point showing in the audio file does not appear to be logically sequential, and that what it actually provides is physical evidence that the audio file was tampered with in at least one section, that is it would appear that a section of conversation has been deleted at that point and then an attempt made once to rejoin the audio file, but the person or people who made the attempt to rejoin the audio file were not satisfied with the result as far as covering up that the audio file had been tampered with, and then they have made a 2nd. attempt to rejoin the audio file, and in doing so, have actually made it more obvious that the audio file was tampered with at that point. I allege, it appears that when the 2nd. attempt was made to rejoin the conversation in the audio file the 4 words "it has to be" instead of being placed to overwrite the 4 words "it has to be" were on the 2nd. attempt to rejoin the conversation in the audio file added immediately after the end of those 4 words and thus the audio file then had an end result of those 4 words "it has to be" showing as repeated. I allege there was around 20 additional seconds where Beth and I were talking about the 2nd. time that she said that she would like to go out with me. I allege that I can remember saying to Beth in that conversation - "I remember you actually said a 2nd. time that you'd like to go out with me because you were'nt sure if I'd heard you the first time." I allege that at least this sentence and Beth's reply have been deleted. I have shown below the part of the conversation which starts at the 1 minute 18 seconds point in the audio file - Myself - "you remember um that day you told me that you'd like to go out with me?" Beth - "Yeah, I said that we'll see." Myself - "and ah I remember you actually said a 2nd. time it has to be it has to be for the first time" I allege its obvious that the sentence showing in the audio file as above of "and ah I remember you actually said a 2nd. time it has to be it has to be for the first time." is not a logical sentence and that the original sentence was "and ah I remember you actually said a 2nd. time that you'd like to go out with me because you were'nt sure if I'd heard you the first time." I allege that I suspect that Police would have felt that additional conversation that Beth and I had with each other about the 2nd. time that Beth said that she would like to go out with me would have been regarded by Police as not conducive to successfully, I allege, fabricate a case and have a successful result from their point of view, and had decided to delete that section of conversation from the audio file before being given to the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions to be part of what they claimed to be evidence. This in addition to evidence that is now a matter of public record and witnessed by myself, the 12 people on the Jury, and Judge Ryrie in the District Court that the 2 words "Yeah, I," spoken by Beth as shown in the sentence "Yeah, I said that we'll see." had disappeared from the audio file after being played in Court in front of the Jury the 1st. time. Immediately after the audio file was played in Court the 1st. time the Judge's Associate took the 4GB Flash Drive that contained the audio file into the Court's official custody, and I allege, only about 1 second after he had walked away from the bar table where there were 3 people, myself, the Barrister's Assistant, and the Prosecution Barrister Michael Gawrych, I heard the Barrister's Assistant make the comment to Michael Gawrych "Thats not good for our case" and that Michael Gawrych replied "Yeah, we should do something about that!" I also note that at the beginning of the trial at a time when the Jury was not present in the Courtroom that the Barrister Michael Gawrych made a verbal submission to Judge Ryrie that the audio had a very high level of static and that due to this the audio file was "inaudible" and therefore although it was originally planned to be submitted into the trial as evidence he had decided to withdraw it from evidence. I then submitted to Her Honour Judge Ryrie that I had been able to easily play a copy of the audio file that I had been given by the Prosecution earlier on a standard Windows PC with no static in the sound at all. I then demonstrated by playing the copy of the audio file that I had been given earlier on my Windows Notebook. Her Honour Judge Ryrie then ordered that the audio file would remain as part of the Prosecution's evidence in the trial. Author: Barry Armstrong Ph. 07 3102 6000 Links audio file Court Transcript 26.5.11, Size 35.7MB which shows the voice of the man who appears in the first 2 photos on the left of this page below who I allege appeared in the Magistrates Court, Beenleigh on the 26th. May 2011, and impersonated the man who appears in the 3rd photo in the first row of photos shown below. He was sworn in as Michael Shippley in the 1st. case. audio file of the Police Interview that had been claimed to be with Beth on 6.9.13, Size 5.4MB which I allege shows the voice of a different woman impersonating Beth, and that the woman's voice that appears in this audio is actually that of a Supervisor who worked at the Service Desk in Woolworths at the Logan Hyperdome in March 2013, who was slim, around 162cm tall and 20 years old, with blonde hair in a single ponytail style, who wore a name badge with a name of Nicola. I allege that her voice and also her giggle matches that of the voice and giggle in this audio file. I went to the Service Desk one day in March 2013 because I had been overcharged. After she had served me and as I began walking away, I heard her say "I'd go out with him too" and then she giggled, and I allege that the way that she giggled matches exactly the giggle in this audio file. audio file Beth on 17.9.13, Size 1.8MB A copy of the Supreme Court Appeal Hearing related to the 2nd case. I have edited this copy to show a fictional name of Beth. The file is in Open Document Text format which can be read using the free program Libre Office. A copy of the Unlawful Stalking Amendment Act 1999