I allege that this page contains actual physical evidence of 2 criminal cases where each time the charge was
Unlawful Stalking and that each crime was actually fabricated by Police, and for all of the total of 3 Witness Statements
( the 2nd case included an Addendum Statement also ) which were claimed by Police to be those of the young women who
Police claimed to be the complainant in each case were actually fabricated by Queensland Police, including the signatures on
them which I allege this page provides actual physical evidence were actually forged by another person.

I allege there was also one Witness in each case who was impersonated by another person, and that the audio files on this
page provide proof of that. I allege there is evidence that the main motives for the 2nd crime to be, I allege, fabricated,
were to attempt to reduce my credibilty in relation to exposing the truth in the first, I allege, fabricated crime, that is,
exposing successfully what could possibly be judged as serious crimes of Forgery and Perjury by Police, and I allege,
Unlawful Stalking of a large number of women by a man named Senior Sergeant Drew Ferguson since at least 2008,
who all suffered serious detriment to their employment by being transferred from their usual place of work.

For her privacy I will refer to the woman claimed by Police to have been the complainant in the 1st. case as
Janelle ( not her real name ).

For her privacy I will refer to the woman claimed by Police to have been the complainant in the 2nd. case as
Beth ( not her real name ).


Links
audio file Court Transcript 26.5.11, Size 35.7MB which shows the voice of the man who appears in the
first 2 photos on the left of this page below who I allege impersonated the man who appears in the
3rd photo in the first row of photos below. He was sworn in as Michael Shippley in the 1st. case.


audio file of the Police Interview that had been claimed to be with Beth on 6.9.13, Size 5.4MB
which I allege shows the voice of a different woman impersonating Beth


audio file Beth on 17.9.13, Size 1.8MB. I allege that just after this audio file had been played in Court
for the 1st. time, that I heard the Prosecution's Barrister's assistant say ( I was at the bar table which meant I was the closest
person in the Courtroom to the Barrister Michael Gawrych and his assistant ) to Michael Gawrych "Thats not good for our case"
and that Michael Gawrych replied "Yeah, we should do something about that!". The 2nd. time the audio file was played in Court
I noticed that the 2 words "Yeah, I" that Beth had spoken had been deleted. This was after the audio file on a 4GB USB Flash Drive
had been taken by the Judge's Associate immediately after being played the 1st. time, and was then under the Court's official custody.

A copy of the Supreme Court Appeal Hearing related to the 2nd case.
I have edited this copy to show a fictional name of Beth.
The file is in Open Document Text format which can be read using the free program Libre Office.


A copy of the Unlawful Stalking Amendment Act 1999



Senior Sergeant Drew Ferguson, also had himself appointed, or was appointed, to be the Police Prosecutor
in the 1st. case initially. I allege there is evidence that after the 1st. time he and I were in the Beenleigh Court
which was on 17.1.11 he decided it was wiser for him not to continue as the Police Prosecutor. It was already
too late though as I allege that I had already recognised his voice on the 17.1.11 as being that of the man who I allege
had been misusing his position as a Police Officer to Unlawfully Stalk myself and a large number of women over a
long period of time especially women who worked at Woolworths Beenleigh. I allege that from August 2009 to the
present time there have been 3 separate times that I have heard Senior Sergeant Drew Ferguson refer to women
as "bitches". One of those times was in late 2015, and I heard him say the words "those bitches at Suncorp".

I had never even been accused of any crime in my whole life before and as Senior Constable Craig Bowman
did not know me at all previously I believe there are reasons to suspect that it was Senior Sergeant Drew Ferguson
who gave the order to Craig Bowman to, I allege, fabricate the 1st. case, and I allege that there are reasons to suspect
that it was Senior Sergeant Drew Ferguson and also Senior Constable Craig Bowman who were behind the decision
for a 2nd case to be, I allege, fabricated. I allege that it was very obvious that the 2 Police Officers who arrived
at my home early in the morning on 20.9.13 did not know me at all or even know that I owned and managed
https://australianwebsites.com

I allege that one of the most striking examples of Unlawful Stalking, by I allege, Drew Ferguson, and from 2012,
I allege there is evidence that Senior Constable Craig Bowman was also participating in the Unlawful Stalking
of women who worked at Woolworths Beenleigh, was against a very intelligent young woman named Ashley Wegman
who I have witnessed evidence was discriminated against by Management in Woolworths Beenleigh and transferred
a total of 6 times from July 2013 to March 2016. I allege that on the Sunday 16th November 2014, I saw 2 men
in Woolworths Beenleigh as I was waiting in line at the checkout. They appeared to be Police in plain clothes
from their appearance, the way they were talking and the fact they had no shopping items. The one who
looked and sounded to be the most senior of the 2 men was wearing a brown jacket and brown tie, that is,
not a typical type of attire for shopping on a Sunday. I allege I heard the other man say to him "He does'nt seem
like a bad guy" and that he replied "Yeah, but he's got something on one of us" Then I allege the other man looked
at a woman named Casey who worked in Woolworths Beenleigh who was some distance away and said to the man
who appeared to be more senior "Maybe we should get rid of her too" It seemed they believed that she was a friend of
Ashley's and may help Ashley to communicate with me. At that time Ashley had been transferred for the 4th. time.
About 2 weeks after the 16th November 2014, the date that I allege that I had heard the comment
"Maybe we should get rid of her too" Casey ( who I can recall being there for at least 4 years previously )
had ceased being employed at Woolworths Beenleigh and I have never noticed her there since then.

About one week after the 16th November 2014 I asked at the Service Desk to talk to the Manager or Assistant Manager.
I then had a brief discussion with the Assistant Manager, a man named Kerry, and I pointed out to him that I
had already witnessed a woman who was part of management at the time say to one of the female staff named
Roxy one evening in September 2013 after referring to Ashley "We're going to get rid of that bitch".
This was shortly before Ashley was transferred for the 2nd time. I allege that just after my brief discussion
that day with the Assistant Manager named Kerry where I had pointed out it was very unethical for Ashley to be
discriminated against, that as I was walking away I heard Kerry say to one of the male staff who appeared to be
around 22 years old, "Fuck! Thats the 4th. time we've tried to get rid of that bitch and failed!"

I had also had a discussion with either the Store Manager or Assistant Manager after the first 3 times that Ashley
had been transferred and each time I had also been successful in ending the discrimination that Ashley had been
subjected to and she was returned to working at Woolworths Beenleigh.

I allege that from June 2013 to September 2013 there was a male Police Officer in plain clothes who it seemed by
his clothing and general appearance was pretending to be a homeless man who was usually standing outside
within 15 metres of the main entrance to the Market Place Shopping Centre in Beenleigh nearly every time I
went shopping during those 4 months. One evening while shopping in Woolworths Beenleigh I allege that I
witnessed Ashley say to this man "Don't you think that what your doing is Unlawful Stalking?" and that he
replied in a boasting kind of way "I get paid for stalking people" and that this man went on to make a number
of threats to Ashley - That if she called me that the Management would find out and he implied to her that her
employment in Woolworths Beenleigh would be adversely effected. Also that if she tried to call me he said that
"We could block your calls". In reply Ashley said that if they did that she could drive to my place to see me in person.
I allege he then replied "If you did that we could charge you with Unlawful Stalking" then Ashley replied
that for her to be charged with Unlawful Stalking that the only possible way that could happen would be if I
were to cooperate with Police to do that and that she did not think there would be any chance of that happening.
Which is 100% correct. If Ashley were to call me or drive to my place to talk to me in person there is not the
slightest chance I would ever cooperate with Police to fabricate a false charge against Ashley, and with the
pattern of discrimination that I have witnessed against her over a long period of time which has also included serious
discrimination against at least 3 of her friends who used to be employed in Woolworths Beenleigh, with I allege
evidence that 3 of her friends were transferred against their will, with Melissa being transferred in January 2012,
with Karena being transferred in December 2012, and with Casey being transferred in early December 2014,
I would have no doubt that Ashley could seek a very substantial amount of compensation for the way she has
been treated at Woolworths Beenleigh over a very long period of time.

I allege that in December 2014 Ashley said that she had been told by Management that she was not allowed
to smile at me and that it had been inferred that if she did smile that her employment would be negatively effected.

Since the new Store Manager, a man named Lee Snell started at Woolworths Beenleigh Ashley appears to have been
discriminated against for a 6th time and also I allege there is evidence that a girl with blond hair whose name I do not
know was unlawfully stalked by Senior Constable Craig Bowman earlier this year and was fired after her first day at work
for smiling and being friendly towards myself. I allege it was the next day after she was there that I heard Senior Constable
Craig Bowman on the property next door to mine ( I live on 3 Hectares of land in Bahrs Scrub which has been rezoned to
being part of a "Major Urban Development area" with a zoning of being divided into 15 to 20 dwellings per Hectare )
talk about her and say that they could get rid of her as I would not really be able to say anything about her to the media
as I would not even know her name. A few weeks after she was no longer there I heard one of the female staff in the Service
Desk area make a comment about her to other female staff in the Service Desk area that she had never seen anyone
fired like that before after just one day. I felt quite shocked at how ruthless the treatment of her had been and that
it was consistent with the treatment I had witnessed earlier of many women who had worked at Woolworths Beenleigh,
that they appear to have been treated as if their lives had no value.

I allege that there is evidence that it seemed that the main reason that some people in management
in Woolworths Beenleigh thought that Ashley was a problem ( from their point of view ) was that they
thought she had a very strong personality and would help me to expose the truth relating to how so many
women at Woolworths Beenleigh had been discriminated against and transferred, and what could be judged
as criminal activity by people misusing their positions as Police to unlawfully stalk women. I allege there is also
evidence that some people in management at Woolworths Beenleigh started thinking that many women who
had worked there including Ashley, could sue Woolworths for a very substantial amount of money and
that transferring and keeping them separate from each other was the best solution to keep that from happening,
as some people in management appeared to have the opinion that if they were separate there would be much
less chance of any woman having the strength of will on her own to start talking to a lawyer. I allege that in 2015
I heard the previous Store Manager at Woolworths Beenleigh, a woman named Kiley say the word" strategy"
and referring to singling out women to be transferred and said it was a "strategy that had worked".
I allege there is evidence that Drew Ferguson and Craig Bowman felt that it would be inconvenient
for them if an attractive younger woman started going out with myself
( and so have been unlawfully stalking a large number of young women, particularly at Woolworths Beenleigh )
as that would tend to disprove a theory that the Prosecution tried to put forward in each case that
a younger woman could not possibly be interested in a man who was older, even one who is a
multi millionaire such as myself.

I estimate the total cost of these 2 cases to Queensland Taxpayers, ( which for the 2nd. case included a Trial process
of 14 days from 2.2.15, including 2 separate Jury selections, one on 2.2.15 and a 2nd. Jury selection on 3.2.15, involving a
total of around 70 people being called to the District Court for the Jury selections ) would have been well over $250,000
( or to put it another way enough money for the QLD Government to have provided a job for the 1st year to around
5 additional first year Nurses in our Public Hospitals ) where I allege Taxpayer funded resources were not just wasted
but knowingly and deliberately misused to harass myself and the 2 intelligent young women in particular who had
been, I allege falsely, claimed by Police to have been complainants in these 2 cases, each of which also included an
Appeal Hearing in the Brisbane Supreme Court.

I would also add that the alleged behaviour of Police would have caused very serious disruption and
distraction and therefore very significant detriment to the lives of each of these 2 intelligent young
women at a time which was very important in each of their lives when they were each part way through
studying at University. I would therefore allege that it would be appropriate that a number of Police,
particularly Senior Sergeant Drew Ferguson and Senior Constable Craig Bowman should be charged
with the crime of Unlawful Stalking, and I also allege that it would be appropriate for a number
of Police, particularly Senior Sergeant Drew Ferguson and Senior Constable Craig Bowman
to be charged with the crime of Unlawful Stalking of myself also.

I allege that near the beginning of October 2014 I heard the voice of Senior Sergeant Drew Ferguson coming from the
property ( corner block ) next door to my property refer to Beth and say in a very threatening way "We've never not been able
to get someone to go along with what we wanted them to say before. We'll tell her that she has to live in Queensland for the
rest of her life and if she does'nt go along with what we want her to say, that we'll make her life hell for the rest of her life."
I allege he also said in a very threatening way "We'll have him killed once we get him into prison".

In the 2nd case there were 2 main allegations by Police - That there was one day that I had followed Beth ( This was refuted by Beth
herself in the first day of the trial. She said that she had walked beside me for a distance of "a few hundred metres" ) inside the Logan
Hyperdome Shopping Centre, and that I had invited Beth out to dinner to a French Restaurant. I pointed out during the trial that even
though there were numerous cameras that would cover virtually every square metre inside the main hall of the Logan Hyperdome
Shopping Centre that Police had not been able to provide any video of that day where Beth and I happened to see each other just
after I had been doing my banking in Suncorp Bank which is inside the Logan Hyperdome. I had requested in writing to Police
( and I had a photocopy of my written request which had been stamped and signed by the person who had received my written
request in the Beenleigh Police Station, as a receipt and I was able to submit this in the trial ) to provide videos of that day and
also of the claimed event of Beth walking into the Logan Police Beat on a separate day, which is inside the Logan Hyperdome
Shopping Centre. Even after Magistrate Morgan gave an order to Police that they should cooperate in providing any videos
that I requested, Police failed or were unable to provide any videos of either of those claimed events.



FURTHER DETAILS - I allege this page contains:

1.
Links to 3 audio files
- The 1st. is the Court recording provided by Auscript of a man who was sworn in
as a Crown Witness named Michael Shippley on 26.5.11, and I allege the audio provides evidence that the voice in the audio
Transcript belongs to that of the man shown in the first 2 photos on the left of this page below and that he was impersonating
in Court Janelle's other boyfriend shown in the 3rd. photo on the left of this page below, and I allege there is evidence that
the alleged impersonation was organised by Senior Sergeant Drew Ferguson and Senior Constable Craig Bowman.

When I put to the man who had been sworn in as a Witness named Michael Shippley in cross examination that the
man who had been at Coles on 14.1.10 ( that is, the man he was supposed to be ) had been no taller than 173cm
tall at that time ( he stated in Court on 26.5.11 that he was 186cm tall ) part of his reply was "people grow".

The time interval between the 14.1.10 and the day this man appeared in Court on 26.5.11 to give Testimony under
Oath during a Committal Hearing was 16 months and 12 days. Janelle had published a photo shown below of
herself standing next to the same man who appeared In Court which showed a Posting Date of 28 June 2009.
I would estimate Janelle's height in June 2009 to be around 172cm tall.

2.
I allege actual physical evidence of a fabricated signature on the Witness Statements of each claimed complainant.
in each case. Documents are shown below so that a comparison can be made of handwriting and signatures.
I alleged that the signature which appeared on 2 separate Witness Statements which showed Beth's name as
the Witness seemed to spell a different person's name, that the signature appeared to spell a surname of Bell
followed by the initial "W" which is completely different to Beth's last name and her real first name does not start
with the the initial "W". I note that each of the letters in the signature on the Witness Statements slopes to the left
while each letter in Beth's signature shown on 2 Rain Check Documents below slopes to the right.

My 1st. career after leaving High School was working in a Bank for 7.5 years, most of the time as the most
senior Teller in a Bank Branch and also as a Bank Examiner during which time I checked signatures an average
of around 100 times per day, which equals around 180,000 times in 7.5 years, during which time I never saw a
single example of any person changing the slope of each letter in their signature from right to left. I had also
completed a Formal Course in my 1st year, run by the Bank, which included significant training in signature comparison.
I also allege that the signature on the Witness Statement showing Janelle's name appears to be a very stylish and well
developed signature typical of a much older person, that is, most likely at least 25 years older than Janelle, and typical
of a person who had signed their signature a very large number of times during their lifetime, and that the signature
was very very different to Janelle's handwriting. I also allege that its possible to tell that the signature on the A4 size
page shown below was signed with a different pen as the signature shows a darker ink by comparison with the 3 lines
showing Janelle's handwriting and that its possible to tell that when the signature was put on the same A4 sheet of
paper that the person put much more pressure of the pen on the paper compared to the pressure put on the paper
for Janelle's 3 lines of handwriting, that the faint dots above the words "input" and "in" and "making" in particular
show that Janelle only put very light pressure of pen on paper.

The main allegation in the 1st case was that I had offered Janelle a part time office job and the Prosecution seemed to
try to imply that I had only offered her a job because I thought that she was attractive. ( My very attractive ex-girlfriend
of 10 years from 2001 to 2011 who is a Doctor with a PHD and a Post Doctorate in Neurology was living with me 24 hours
a day during 2009 ).

I allege that when I was in a room on the other side of the hall from the Beenleigh District Court, Courtroom 1 on 17.5.12
there was a Lawyer named Samit Seth and a Barrister ( who had been referred to as a Mr. Bagley from the Gold Coast )
in the room ( who had been paid for by Queensland Taxpayers ) and that they were both strongly trying to push me to
plead guilty, with the Barrister saying things such as anything could happen in a trial and that if I accepted the deal that
had been offered by the Prosecution there would only be a probation period with no conviction recorded, and that it would
just mean that I would need to visit a Probation Office occasionally and that after a while it would only be once every 6 months.

I consistently refused to plead guilty for over 30 minutes and I allege that I said to the Lawyer that I did not believe it had been
Janelle's signature on the Witness Statement. I allege that after some time the Lawyer seemed a bit impatient and said to me if
he went out and obtained her signature would I be prepared to plead guilty. I gave him 6 A4 sheets of paper and I put my initials
on the back of each sheet of paper before giving them to him. He went out and returned about 10 minutes later with a signature
at the bottom of each sheet of A4 paper including one which had 3 lines of Janelle's handwriting on it.

I also allege that just after walking out of the Courtroom later that day and while still in the hall outside, that the Lawyer and the
Barrister were walking together about 10 metres in front of me, and that I heard the Barrister say to the Lawyer
"Well, you did the Police a big favour covering that up for them".

It was only due to a short time later that I had lodged an appeal to the Brisbane Supreme Court that I received a typed Transcript of
the District Court Hearing that took place on the 17.5.12. I felt surprised to discover when reading it that the Barrister who I knew as
a Mr Bagley had claimed in Court that day, ( at a time while I was in the room across the hall ) while talking to Judge Dearden in Court,
that he had had a 1 hour meeting scheduled with myself inside the Beenleigh Court House the day before on the 16.5.12 and that
the meeting had taken place and had actually then been extended to last for 3 hours.

The reason I felt surprised to read this in the Transcript was that there had never been any meeting scheduled between myself and
Mr. Bagley for the 16.5.12 and I definitely never even entered the Beenleigh Court House building on the 16.5.12. The only discussion
there had been from the Lawyer Samit Seth about meeting the Barrister was that he would be there on the 1st. Floor at, I think it was 10am
on the 17.5.12 so that I would have some time to talk with him then. I still remember clearly that on the morning of the 17.5.12 I saw a man
sitting in a room opposite the District Court and that the first thing I said to him was "Hi, my name is Barry. Are you waiting for me?"
as I had never met him before ( or talked with him on the phone ) and had not been given any clue as to what he looked like.

3.
I allege that one of the audio files provides actual physical evidence of a Police interview with a woman who is impersonating
Beth in the interview and that this was played in the District Court Beenleigh as being claimed to be Beth's voice.
I allege also there is evidence that a number of Police were aware that the audio interview was fabricated with another woman
impersonating Beth. Please also note that apart from, I allege, a different voice and a different style of talking and personality,
the woman's voice uses the word "plaid" and it was stated by a Crown Witness in the trial, Beth's supervisor, that Beth had only
ever said to her that I always wore "business" shirts.

4.
I allege that the audio file showing Beth's voice in conversation with myself on the 17.9.13 ( which was the last day that Beth
and I were talking to each other in Woolworths. ) provides evidence that at the point which is 1 minute and 28 seconds into
the audio file that it is possible to tell that 4 words "it has to be" said by myself are quickly repeated in the audio file, and
repeated precisely in sound and tone, and rather than indicating that I was repeating those words as part of the conversation, that
section of conversation from the 1 minute and 28 seconds point showing in the audio file does not appear to be logically sequential,
and that what it actually provides is physical evidence that the audio file was tampered with in at least one section, that is it
would appear that a section of conversation has been deleted at that point and then an attempt made once to rejoin the audio file,
but the person or people who made the attempt to rejoin the audio file were not satisfied with the result as far as covering up that
the audio file had been tampered with, and then they have made a 2nd. attempt to rejoin the audio file, and in doing so, have actually
made it more obvious that the audio file was tampered with at that point. I allege, it appears that when the 2nd. attempt was made
to rejoin the conversation in the audio file the 4 words "it has to be" instead of being placed to overwrite the 4 words "it has to be"
were on the 2nd. attempt to rejoin the conversation in the audio file added immediately after the end of those 4 words and thus
the audio file then had an end result of those 4 words "it has to be" showing as repeated. I allege there was around 20
additional seconds where Beth and I were talking about the 2nd. time that she said that she would like to go out with me.
I allege that I can remember saying to Beth in that conversation -

"I remember you actually said a 2nd. time that you'd like to go out with me because you were'nt sure if I'd heard you the first time."

I allege that at least this sentence and Beth's reply have been deleted.

I have shown below the part of the conversation which starts at the 1 minute 18 seconds point in the audio file -

Myself - "you remember um that day you told me that you'd like to go out with me?"
Beth - "Yeah, I said that we'll see."
Myself - "and ah I remember you actually said a 2nd. time it has to be it has to be for the first time"

I allege its obvious that the sentence showing in the audio file as above of

"and ah I remember you actually said a 2nd. time it has to be it has to be for the first time."

is not a logical sentence and that the original sentence was

"and ah I remember you actually said a 2nd. time that you'd like to go out with me because you were'nt sure if I'd heard you the first time."

I allege that I suspect that Police would have felt that additional conversation that Beth and I had with each other about the 2nd. time that
Beth said that she would like to go out with me would have been regarded by Police as not conducive to successfully, I allege, fabricate
a case and have a successful result from their point of view, and had decided to delete that section of conversation from the audio file
before being given to the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions to be part of what they claimed to be evidence.

This in addition to evidence that is now a matter of public record and witnessed by myself, the 12 people on the Jury, and Judge Ryrie in
the District Court that the 2 words "Yeah, I," spoken by Beth as shown in the sentence "Yeah, I said that we'll see." had disappeared from the
audio file after being played in Court in front of the Jury the 1st. time. Immediately after the audio file was played in Court the 1st. time the
Judge's Associate took the 4GB Flash Drive that contained the audio file into the Court's official custody, and I allege, only about 1 second
after he had walked away from the bar table where there were 3 people, myself, the Barrister's Assistant, and the Prosecution Barrister
Michael Gawrych, I heard the Barrister's Assistant make the comment to Michael Gawrych "Thats not good for our case" and that
Michael Gawrych replied "Yeah, we should do something about that!"

I also note that at the beginning of the trial at a time when the Jury was not present in the Courtroom that the Barrister Michael Gawrych
made a verbal submission to Judge Ryrie that the audio had a very high level of static and that due to this the audio file was "inaudible"
and therefore although it was originally planned to be submitted into the trial as evidence he had decided to withdraw it from evidence.
I then submitted to Her Honour Judge Ryrie that I had been able to easily play a copy of the audio file that I had been given by the
Prosecution earlier on a standard Windows PC with no static in the sound at all. I then demonstrated by playing the copy of the
audio file that I had been given earlier on my Windows Notebook. Her Honour Judge Ryrie then ordered that the audio file would
remain as part of the Prosecution's evidence in the trial.



Author: Barry Armstrong
Ph. 07 3102 6000



Links
audio file Court Transcript 26.5.11, Size 35.7MB which shows the voice of the man who appears in the
first 2 photos on the left of this page below who I allege impersonated the man who appears in the
3rd photo in the first row of photos below. He was sworn in as Michael Shippley in the 1st. case.


audio file of the Police Interview that had been claimed to be with Beth on 6.9.13, Size 5.4MB
which I allege shows the voice of a different woman impersonating Beth


audio file Beth on 17.9.13, Size 1.8MB

A copy of the Supreme Court Appeal Hearing related to the 2nd case.
I have edited this copy to show a fictional name of Beth.
The file is in Open Document Text format which can be read using the free program Libre Office.


A copy of the Unlawful Stalking Amendment Act 1999